| Title |
Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, April 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1007714509322 |
| Authors |
George Wu, Richard Gonzalez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 36% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 17% |
| Psychology | 5 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2012.
All research outputs
#1,811,876
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#52
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#769
of 32,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.