You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Urology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.022 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elena Castro, Chee Goh, Daniel Leongamornlert, Ed Saunders, Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz, Tokhir Dadaev, Koveela Govindasami, Michelle Guy, Steve Ellis, Debra Frost, Elizabeth Bancroft, Trevor Cole, Marc Tischkowitz, M. John Kennedy, Jacqueline Eason, Carole Brewer, D. Gareth Evans, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Mary E. Porteous, Fiona Douglas, Julian Adlard, Alan Donaldson, Antonis C. Antoniou, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Douglas F. Easton, David Olmos, Rosalind Eeles |
Abstract |
Germline BRCA mutations are associated with worse prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes; however, the most appropriate management for mutation carriers has not yet been investigated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 35% |
Spain | 3 | 6% |
Brazil | 2 | 4% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 49% |
Scientists | 16 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 252 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 43 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Other | 19 | 7% |
Student > Master | 16 | 6% |
Other | 45 | 18% |
Unknown | 78 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 7% |
Engineering | 6 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Unknown | 84 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#376,031
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#115
of 6,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,875
of 276,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#2
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.