↓ Skip to main content

Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in European Urology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
49 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
284 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of BRCA Mutations on Metastatic Relapse and Cause-specific Survival After Radical Treatment for Localised Prostate Cancer
Published in
European Urology, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Castro, Chee Goh, Daniel Leongamornlert, Ed Saunders, Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz, Tokhir Dadaev, Koveela Govindasami, Michelle Guy, Steve Ellis, Debra Frost, Elizabeth Bancroft, Trevor Cole, Marc Tischkowitz, M. John Kennedy, Jacqueline Eason, Carole Brewer, D. Gareth Evans, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Mary E. Porteous, Fiona Douglas, Julian Adlard, Alan Donaldson, Antonis C. Antoniou, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Douglas F. Easton, David Olmos, Rosalind Eeles

Abstract

Germline BRCA mutations are associated with worse prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes; however, the most appropriate management for mutation carriers has not yet been investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 252 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 19 7%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 78 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Engineering 6 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 84 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#376,031
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from European Urology
#115
of 6,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,875
of 276,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Urology
#2
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.