↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Clinically and Empirically Defined Talents and Strengths in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
28 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of Clinically and Empirically Defined Talents and Strengths in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2296-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrée-Anne S. Meilleur, Patricia Jelenic, Laurent Mottron

Abstract

Outstanding skills, including special isolated skills (SIS) and perceptual peaks (PP) are frequent features of autism. However, their reported prevalence varies between studies and their co-occurrence is unknown. We determined the prevalence of SIS in a large group of 254 autistic individuals and searched for PP in 46 of these autistic individuals and 46 intelligence and age-matched typically developing controls. The prevalence of SIS among autistic individuals was 62.5 % and that of PP was 58 % (13 % in controls). The prevalence of SIS increased with intelligence and age. The existence of an SIS in a particular modality was not associated with the presence of a PP in the same modality. This suggests that talents involve an experience-dependent component in addition to genetically defined alterations of perceptual encoding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#491,936
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#136
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,161
of 276,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.