↓ Skip to main content

A simple risk scoring system for predicting acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
A simple risk scoring system for predicting acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients
Published in
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11748-014-0487-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshihiko Sato, Haruhiko Kondo, Atsushi Watanabe, Jun Nakajima, Hiroshi Niwa, Hirotoshi Horio, Jiro Okami, Norihito Okumura, Kenji Sugio, Satoshi Teramukai, Kazuma Kishi, Masahito Ebina, Yukihiko Sugiyama, Takashi Kondo, Hiroshi Date

Abstract

Lung cancer patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) who have undergone pulmonary resection often develop acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia (AE) in the post-operative period. To predict who is at high risk of AE, we propose a scoring system that evaluates the risk of AE in lung cancer patients with ILDs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 3%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 28%
Other 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,203,791
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#139
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,071
of 260,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.