↓ Skip to main content

Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests

Overview of attention for article published in Environment Systems and Decisions, September 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 339)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1060 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1082 Mendeley
Title
Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests
Published in
Environment Systems and Decisions, September 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02240252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norman Myers

Abstract

The mass-extinction episode underway is largely centered on tropical forests, insofar as they contain at least half of all Earth's species and they are being depleted faster than any other biome. But species distributions and depletion patterns are anything but uniform throughout the biome. This paper identifies 10 areas that a) are characterized by exceptional concentrations of species with high levels of endemism and b) are experiencing unusually rapid rates of depletion. While these "hotspot" areas comprise less than 3.5% of remaining primary forests, they harbor over 34,000 endemic plant species (27% of all plant species in tropical forests and 13% of all plant species worldwide). They also feature 700,000 endemic animal species and possibly several times more. Unfortunately, they appear likely to lose 90% of their forest cover as soon as the end of the century or shortly thereafter, causing the extinction of almost 7% of Earth's plant species and at least a similar proportion of animal species, this occurring in only 0.2% of Earth's land surface. By concentrating on such areas where needs are greatest and where the pay-off from safeguard measures would also be greatest, conservationists can engage in a more systematized response to the challenge of large-scale extinctions impending in tropical forests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,082 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 16 1%
United States 11 1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Other 15 1%
Unknown 1017 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 181 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 179 17%
Researcher 178 16%
Student > Bachelor 144 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 5%
Other 153 14%
Unknown 191 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 449 41%
Environmental Science 260 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 3%
Social Sciences 25 2%
Other 58 5%
Unknown 226 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#887,605
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environment Systems and Decisions
#15
of 339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73
of 12,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment Systems and Decisions
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them