↓ Skip to main content

Nurses’ perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: questionnaire development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nurses’ perception of the use of computerised information systems in practice: questionnaire development
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, December 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03003.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Oroviogoicoechea, Roger Watson, Elena Beortegui, Silvia Remirez

Abstract

To develop and validate a questionnaire to explore the perceptions of nurses about the implementation of a computerised information system in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,559,413
of 24,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,136
of 5,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,378
of 158,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.