↓ Skip to main content

Restoration of Muscle Mitochondrial Function and Metabolic Flexibility in Type 2 Diabetes by Exercise Training Is Paralleled by Increased Myocellular Fat Storage and Improved Insulin Sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restoration of Muscle Mitochondrial Function and Metabolic Flexibility in Type 2 Diabetes by Exercise Training Is Paralleled by Increased Myocellular Fat Storage and Improved Insulin Sensitivity
Published in
Diabetes, December 2009
DOI 10.2337/db09-1322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth C.R. Meex, Vera B. Schrauwen-Hinderling, Esther Moonen-Kornips, Gert Schaart, Marco Mensink, Esther Phielix, Tineke van de Weijer, Jean-Pierre Sels, Patrick Schrauwen, Matthijs K.C. Hesselink

Abstract

Mitochondrial dysfunction and fat accumulation in skeletal muscle (increased intramyocellular lipid [IMCL]) have been linked to development of type 2 diabetes. We examined whether exercise training could restore mitochondrial function and insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 321 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 16%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 66 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 13%
Sports and Recreations 38 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 84 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,815,465
of 24,326,994 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#771
of 9,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,293
of 171,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,326,994 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.