You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Embedding electronic growth charts into clinical practice at a children’s hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313588 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward T Andrews, Stephen Wootton, David Cable, Alastair Marchant, Harriet Miller, Justin H Davies |
| Abstract |
Embedding electronic growth charts (EGCs) into clinical practice in a children's hospital. We employed initial implementation in the outpatient setting and subsequently extended this across inpatients with the growth chart following the child's records through both settings and significantly increasing growth data documentation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 30% |
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,496,121
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition
#594
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,952
of 336,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Education & Practice Edition
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.