↓ Skip to main content

Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
20 blogs
twitter
96 X users
patent
2 patents
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurological and Robot-Controlled Induction of an Apparition
Published in
Current Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olaf Blanke, Polona Pozeg, Masayuki Hara, Lukas Heydrich, Andrea Serino, Akio Yamamoto, Toshiro Higuchi, Roy Salomon, Margitta Seeck, Theodor Landis, Shahar Arzy, Bruno Herbelin, Hannes Bleuler, Giulio Rognini

Abstract

Tales of ghosts, wraiths, and other apparitions have been reported in virtually all cultures. The strange sensation that somebody is nearby when no one is actually present and cannot be seen (feeling of a presence, FoP) is a fascinating feat of the human mind, and this apparition is often covered in the literature of divinity, occultism, and fiction. Although it is described by neurological and psychiatric patients and healthy individuals in different situations, it is not yet understood how the phenomenon is triggered by the brain. Here, we performed lesion analysis in neurological FoP patients, supported by an analysis of associated neurological deficits. Our data show that the FoP is an illusory own-body perception with well-defined characteristics that is associated with sensorimotor loss and caused by lesions in three distinct brain regions: temporoparietal, insular, and especially frontoparietal cortex. Based on these data and recent experimental advances of multisensory own-body illusions, we designed a master-slave robotic system that generated specific sensorimotor conflicts and enabled us to induce the FoP and related illusory own-body perceptions experimentally in normal participants. These data show that the illusion of feeling another person nearby is caused by misperceiving the source and identity of sensorimotor (tactile, proprioceptive, and motor) signals of one's own body. Our findings reveal the neural mechanisms of the FoP, highlight the subtle balance of brain mechanisms that generate the experience of "self" and "other," and advance the understanding of the brain mechanisms responsible for hallucinations in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 284 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 22%
Researcher 59 19%
Student > Master 47 15%
Other 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 62 20%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 23%
Neuroscience 46 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 7%
Computer Science 22 7%
Other 54 18%
Unknown 57 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 716. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#28,959
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#269
of 14,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 277,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#1
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.