↓ Skip to main content

Finger cold-induced vasodilation: a review

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
218 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Finger cold-induced vasodilation: a review
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00421-003-0818-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. A. M. Daanen

Abstract

Cold-induced vasodilation (CIVD) in the finger tips generally occurs 5-10 min after the start of local cold exposure of the extremities. This phenomenon is believed to reduce the risk of local cold injuries. However, CIVD is almost absent during hypothermia, when survival of the organism takes precedence over the survival of peripheral tissue. Subjects that are often exposed to local cold (e.g. fish filleters) develop an enhanced CIVD response. Also, differences between ethnic groups are obvious, with black people having the weakest CIVD response. Many other factors affect CIVD, such as diet, alcohol consumption, altitude, age and stress. CIVD is probably caused by a sudden decrease in the release of neurotransmitters from the sympathetic nerves to the muscular coat of the arterio-venous anastomoses (AVAs) due to local cold. AVAs are specific thermoregulatory organs that regulate blood flow in the cold and heat. Their relatively large diameter enables large amounts of blood to pass and convey heat to the surrounding tissue. Unfortunately, information on the quantity of AVAs is lacking, which makes it difficult to estimate the full impact on peripheral blood flow. This review illustrates the thermospecificity of the AVAs and the close link to CIVD. CIVD is influenced by many parameters, but controlled experiments yield information on how CIVD protects the extremities against cold injuries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 201 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 35 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 20%
Sports and Recreations 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 12%
Engineering 24 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,228,996
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,183
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,055
of 60,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.