↓ Skip to main content

Endocrine Disruptors and the Breast: Early Life Effects and Later Life Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Endocrine Disruptors and the Breast: Early Life Effects and Later Life Disease
Published in
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10911-013-9275-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madisa B. Macon, Suzanne E. Fenton

Abstract

Breast cancer risk has both heritable and environment/lifestyle components. The heritable component is a small contribution (5-27 %), leaving the majority of risk to environment (e.g., applied chemicals, food residues, occupational hazards, pharmaceuticals, stress) and lifestyle (e.g., physical activity, cosmetics, water source, alcohol, smoking). However, these factors are not well-defined, primarily due to the enormous number of factors to be considered. In both humans and rodent models, environmental factors that act as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) have been shown to disrupt normal mammary development and lead to adverse lifelong consequences, especially when exposures occur during early life. EDCs can act directly or indirectly on mammary tissue to increase sensitivity to chemical carcinogens or enhance development of hyperplasia, beaded ducts, or tumors. Protective effects have also been reported. The mechanisms for these changes are not well understood. Environmental agents may also act as carcinogens in adult rodent models, directly causing or promoting tumor development, typically in more than one organ. Many of the environmental agents that act as EDCs and are known to affect the breast are discussed. Understanding the mechanism(s) of action for these compounds will be critical to prevent their effects on the breast in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 48 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Environmental Science 10 6%
Chemistry 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#152
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,172
of 208,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.