↓ Skip to main content

International Summit 2014: Organisation of clinical ultrasound in the world

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
International Summit 2014: Organisation of clinical ultrasound in the world
Published in
Insights into Imaging, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13244-014-0358-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is a widely used imaging modality throughout the world, yet differences in usage remain among countries or regions, according to the results of the International Summit, organised by the ESR during the European Congress of Radiology last March in Vienna. The International Summit is held each year by the ESR and its partner national and international societies of radiology from outside Europe with the primary goal of gathering information about a particular topic in radiology from a worldwide perspective. In 2014, some aspects of the practice of US imaging within and outside radiology were discussed, following a list of items prepared by the ESR Working Group on Ultrasound. Results showed that radiological US has similar problems throughout the world. At the same time, however, there are profound differences in how US is practised and the results of this meeting should be considered with caution. The results of the International Summit offer an overview of the major trends and differences in the use of US worldwide, but as a whole suggest that this imaging technique still plays a major role in radiology and health care.Main messages• US is a widely used modality and constitutes a great part of radiological workload.• The use of ultrasound is split between radiological and non-radiological services.• Training differs among countries and the presence of local subspecialty societies improves training quality.• The shortage of local radiologists and lack of interest among young radiologists are worrying.• US use should not be limited to radiologists alone, especially in sparsely populated areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Colombia 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,737,033
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#468
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,817
of 269,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.