| Title |
Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0732-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Cella, Seung Choi, Sofia Garcia, Karon F. Cook, Sarah Rosenbloom, Jin-Shei Lai, Donna Surges Tatum, Richard Gershon |
| Abstract |
Although the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) has increased markedly, clinical interpretation of scores remains lacking. We developed a method to identify clinical severity thresholds for pain, fatigue, depression, and anxiety in people with cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Portugal | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 22% |
| Psychology | 17 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,789,079
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,595
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,424
of 228,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.