↓ Skip to main content

Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
313 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
Title
Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-014-0270-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Carretié

Abstract

Current knowledge on the architecture of exogenous attention (also called automatic, bottom-up, or stimulus-driven attention, among other terms) has been mainly obtained from studies employing neutral, anodyne stimuli. Since, from an evolutionary perspective, exogenous attention can be understood as an adaptive tool for rapidly detecting salient events, reorienting processing resources to them, and enhancing processing mechanisms, emotional events (which are, by definition, salient for the individual) would seem crucial to a comprehensive understanding of this process. This review, focusing on the visual modality, describes 55 experiments in which both emotional and neutral irrelevant distractors are presented at the same time as ongoing task targets. Qualitative and, when possible, meta-analytic descriptions of results are provided. The most conspicuous result is that, as confirmed by behavioral and/or neural indices, emotional distractors capture exogenous attention to a significantly greater extent than do neutral distractors. The modulatory effects of the nature of distractors capturing attention, of the ongoing task characteristics, and of individual differences, previously proposed as mediating factors, are also described. Additionally, studies reviewed here provide temporal and spatial information-partially absent in traditional cognitive models-on the neural basis of preattention/evaluation, reorienting, and sensory amplification, the main subprocesses involved in exogenous attention. A model integrating these different levels of information is proposed. The present review, which reveals that there are several key issues for which experimental data are surprisingly scarce, confirms the relevance of including emotional distractors in studies on exogenous attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 441 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 22%
Student > Master 62 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 12%
Researcher 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Other 74 16%
Unknown 83 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 221 49%
Neuroscience 45 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 2%
Other 46 10%
Unknown 103 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,726,873
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#296
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,571
of 228,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.