↓ Skip to main content

Susan T. Stevens and Jonathan P. Conant (Eds.): North Africa under Byzantium and Early Islam. (Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine symposia and colloquia)

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Susan T. Stevens and Jonathan P. Conant (Eds.): North Africa under Byzantium and Early Islam. (Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine symposia and colloquia)
Published in
African Archaeological Review, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10437-017-9249-z
Authors

Ralf Bockmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,991
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#296
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,527
of 312,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.