↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of quantification methods for left arial late gadolinium enhancement based on different references in patients with atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of quantification methods for left arial late gadolinium enhancement based on different references in patients with atrial fibrillation
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0563-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung Ho Hwang, Yu-Whan Oh, Dae In Lee, Jaemin Shim, Sang-Weon Park, Young-Hoon Kim

Abstract

By using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) imaging, we compared left atrial late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) quantification methods based on different references to characterize the left atrial wall in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Thirty-eight patients who underwent three-dimensional LGE-CMR imaging before catheter ablation for AF were classified into three groups depending on their clinical AF type: (1) paroxysmal AF (PAF; n = 12); (2) persistent AF (PeAF; n = 16); and (3) recurrent AF after catheter ablation (RAF; n = 10). To quantify LA-LGE on LGE-CMR imaging, we used the thresholds of 2 standard deviations (2-SD), 3-SD, 4-SD, 5-SD, or 6-SD above the mean signal from the unenhanced left ventricular myocardium, and we used the full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique, which was based on the maximum signal from the mitral valve with high signal intensity. The 6-SD threshold and FWHM techniques were statistically reproducible with an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.7. On applying the FWHM technique, the normalized LA-LGE volume by LA wall area showed a significant difference between the RAF, PeAF, and PAF groups (0.22 ± 0.04, 0.16 ± 0.06, and 0.09 ± 0.03 mL/cm(2), respectively) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, most of the fibrotic scarring and low-voltage tissue on the electroanatomic map corresponded well with the extent of LA-LGE. The FWHM technique based on the mitral valve can provide a reproducible quantification of LA-LGE related to AF in the thin LA wall.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 57%
Computer Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,116
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,981
of 275,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#14
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.