↓ Skip to main content

Sites of Origin of Oral Cavity Cancer in Nonsmokers vs Smokers: Possible Evidence of Dental Trauma Carcinogenesis and Its Importance Compared With Human Papillomavirus

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sites of Origin of Oral Cavity Cancer in Nonsmokers vs Smokers: Possible Evidence of Dental Trauma Carcinogenesis and Its Importance Compared With Human Papillomavirus
Published in
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, January 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendan J. Perry, Andrew P. Zammit, Andrew W. Lewandowski, Julia J. Bashford, Adrian S. Dragovic, Emily J. Perry, Reza Hayatbakhsh, Christopher F. L. Perry

Abstract

The relatively high and possibly rising incidence of mouth squamous cell carcinoma in nonsmokers, especially women, without obvious cause has been noted by previous authors. Is chronic dental trauma and irritation a carcinogen, and what is its importance compared with human papillomavirus (HPV) oropharyngeal cancer in nonsmokers?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 47%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#981,978
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
#321
of 3,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,639
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
#5
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.