↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Enhancing Response in the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patient The 3B Perspective—Bench, Bits, and Bedside

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Enhancing Response in the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patient The 3B Perspective—Bench, Bits, and Bedside
Published in
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelo Auricchio, Frits W. Prinzen

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established nonpharmacological treatment for patients with heart failure (HF), reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. Although the therapy was developed 30 years ago and approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2001, attempts to improve it have never stopped. Such improvements have been facilitated by combining knowledge from bench (basic science), bits (computer modeling), and bedside (clinical studies); these issues are addressed in the present review. Improvements include better patient selection, positioning of the LV lead, pacing from multiple sites, and optimization of atrioventricular and ventriculo-ventricular intervals. Overall, patterns of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic (strain) signals appear to be more useful for patient selection than timing intervals (QRS duration, time-to-peak shortening). Quadripolar leads have significantly improved CRT outcome due to increased electrical and mechanical lead performance (avoiding phrenic nerve stimulation and improving lead stability), but also thanks to the flexibility offered by the novel leads to avoid in-scar pacing. The benefit of multiple site stimulation over optimal conventional biventricular pacing seems small and is awaiting evidence from large trials. There is rapidly growing interest in merging imaging information to guide positioning of the LV lead in late activated regions without scar and in LV lead positions other than the epicardial coronary veins (LV endocardium, His bundle, LV septum). All these developments look promising but await further clinical validation. Finally, computer modeling is rapidly becoming important in understanding the substrate for CRT, in improving and assisting patient selection, as well as in guiding therapy planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 28%
Engineering 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,523,816
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#337
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,847
of 342,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.