↓ Skip to main content

The experience of community first responders in co-producing rural health care: in the liminal gap between citizen and professional

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
The experience of community first responders in co-producing rural health care: in the liminal gap between citizen and professional
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Roberts, Amy Nimegeer, Jane Farmer, David J Heaney

Abstract

The involvement of community first responders (CFRs) in medical emergencies in Scotland, and particularly in remote and rural areas, has expanded rapidly in recent years in response to geographical and organisational challenges of emergency medical service access. In 2013 there were over 120 active or developing schemes in a wide variety of settings. Community first responders are volunteers trained in First Person on the Scene (FPOS) first aid, administered prior to the arrival of an ambulance. Although there is limited literature which describes the role of first response, little academic literature has been published about the complexities of their specific role in both the community and organisational contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2016.
All research outputs
#12,613,247
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,079
of 7,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,643
of 258,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#93
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.