↓ Skip to main content

Acquisition and analysis of cardiovascular signals on smartphones: potential, pitfalls and perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acquisition and analysis of cardiovascular signals on smartphones: potential, pitfalls and perspectives
Published in
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, October 2014
DOI 10.1177/2047487314552604
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nico Bruining, Enrico Caiani, Catherine Chronaki, Przemyslaw Guzik, Enno van der Velde

Abstract

Smartphones, mobile applications ('apps'), social media, analytics, and the cloud are profoundly changing the practice of medicine and the way health decisions are made. With the constant progress of technology, the measurement of vital signals becomes easier, cheaper, and practically a standard approach in clinical practice. The interest in measuring vital signals goes beyond medical professionals to the general public, patients, informal caregivers, and healthy individuals, who frequently lack any formal medical training. On smartphone platforms such as iOS and Android, a proliferation of health or medical 'apps' acquire and analyse a variety of vital signs through embedded sensors, interconnected devices or peripherals utilising on occasion analytics and social media. Smartphone vendors compete with traditional medical device manufacturers in the grey area between health care, wellness, and fitness, as US and EU regulatory bodies are setting and revising rules for these new technologies. On the other hand, in the absence of robust validation results, clinicians are hesitant to trust measurements by apps or recommend specific apps to their patients, partly also due to lack of a cost reimbursement policy. This review focuses on the acquisition and analysis on smartphones of three important vital signs in the cardiovascular and respiratory field as well as in rehabilitation i.e. heart or pulse rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygenation. The potential, pitfalls, and perspectives on mobile devices and smartphone apps for health management by patients and healthy individuals are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Computer Science 13 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,738,793
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#851
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,878
of 278,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.