↓ Skip to main content

Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,551)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, September 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00359-003-0454-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Arikawa

Abstract

This review outlines our recent studies on the spectral organization of butterfly compound eyes, with emphasis on the Japanese yellow swallowtail butterfly, Papilio xuthus, which is the most extensively studied species. Papilio has color vision when searching for nectar among flowers, and their compound eyes are furnished with six distinct classes of spectral receptors (UV, violet, blue, green, red, broadband). The compound eyes consist of many ommatidia, each containing nine photoreceptor cells. How are the six classes of spectral receptors arranged in the ommatidia? By studying their electrophysiology, histology, and molecular biology, it was found that the Papilio ommatidia can be divided into three types according to the combination of spectral receptors they contain. Different types of ommatidia are distributed randomly over the retina. Histologically, the heterogeneity appeared to be related to red or yellow pigmentation around the rhabdom. A subset of red-pigmented ommatidia contains 3-hydroxyretinol in the distal portion, fluorescing under UV epi-illumination. The red, yellow and fluorescing pigments all play crucial roles in determining the spectral sensitivities of receptors. Spectral heterogeneity and random array of ommatidia have also been found in other lepidopteran species. Similarities and differences between species are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 110 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 8%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#900,739
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#37
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#824
of 55,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them