↓ Skip to main content

The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0387-z
Authors

Henri Waisman, Céline Guivarch, Fabio Grazi, Jean Charles Hourcade

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 13 10%
Other 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 19%
Engineering 16 13%
Energy 8 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,889,686
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#1,126
of 6,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,942
of 251,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#11
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.