You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.06.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura M. Amendola, Gail P. Jarvik, Michael C. Leo, Heather M. McLaughlin, Yassmine Akkari, Michelle D. Amaral, Jonathan S. Berg, Sawona Biswas, Kevin M. Bowling, Laura K. Conlin, Greg M. Cooper, Michael O. Dorschner, Matthew C. Dulik, Arezou A. Ghazani, Rajarshi Ghosh, Robert C. Green, Ragan Hart, Carrie Horton, Jennifer J. Johnston, Matthew S. Lebo, Aleksandar Milosavljevic, Jeffrey Ou, Christine M. Pak, Ronak Y. Patel, Sumit Punj, Carolyn Sue Richards, Joseph Salama, Natasha T. Strande, Yaping Yang, Sharon E. Plon, Leslie G. Biesecker, Heidi L. Rehm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,409,786
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,296
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,066
of 367,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#23
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.