↓ Skip to main content

Supported Decision-Making: Implications from Positive Psychology for Assessment and Intervention in Rehabilitation and Employment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Supported Decision-Making: Implications from Positive Psychology for Assessment and Intervention in Rehabilitation and Employment
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10926-017-9740-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatice Uyanik, Karrie A. Shogren, Peter Blanck

Abstract

Purpose This article reviews existing literature on positive psychology, supported decision-making (SDM), employment, and disability. It examines interventions and assessments that have been empirically evaluated for the enhancement of decision-making and overall well-being of people with disabilities. Additionally, conceptual themes present in the literature were explored. Methods A systematic review was conducted across two databases (ERIC and PsychINFO) using various combination of keywords of 'disabilit*', work rehabilitation and employment terms, positive psychology terms, and SDM components. Seven database searches were conducted with diverse combinations of keywords, which identified 1425 results in total to be screened for relevance using their titles and abstracts. Database search was supplemented with hand searches of oft-cited journals, ancestral search, and supplemental search from grey literature. Results Only four studies were identified in the literature targeting SDM and positive psychology related constructs in the employment and job development context. Results across the studies indicated small to moderate impacts of the assessment and interventions on decision-making and engagement outcomes. Conceptually there are thematic areas of potential overlap, although they are limited in the explicit integration of theory in supported decision-making, positive psychology, disability, and employment. Conclusion Results suggest a need for additional scholarship in this area that focuses on theory development and integration as well as empirical work. Such work should examine the potential utility of considering positive psychological interventions when planning for SDM in the context of career development activities to enhance positive outcomes related to decision-making, self-determination, and other positive psychological constructs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 16%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 33 36%