↓ Skip to main content

The obesity paradox in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
The obesity paradox in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10654-014-9961-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacek Niedziela, Bartosz Hudzik, Natalia Niedziela, Mariusz Gąsior, Marek Gierlotka, Jarosław Wasilewski, Krzysztof Myrda, Andrzej Lekston, Lech Poloński, Piotr Rozentryt

Abstract

In the general population, the lowest mortality risk is considered to be for the body mass index (BMI) range of 20-24.9 kg/m(2). In chronic diseases (chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) the best survival is observed in overweight or obese patients. Recently above-mentioned phenomenon, called obesity paradox, has been described in patients with coronary artery disease. Our aim was to analyze the relationship between BMI and total mortality in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the context of obesity paradox. We searched scientific databases for studies describing relation in body mass index with mortality in patients with ACS. The study selection process was performed according to PRISMA statement. Crude mortality rates, odds ratio or risk ratio for all-cause mortality were extracted from articles and included into meta-analysis. 26 studies and 218,532 patients with ACS were included into meta-analysis. The highest risk of mortality was found in Low BMI patients-RR 1.47 (95 % CI 1.24-1.74). Overweight, obese and severely obese patients had lower mortality compared with those with normal BMI-RR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.64-0.76), RR 0.60, (95 % CI 0.53-0.68) and RR 0.70 (95 % CI 0.58-0.86), respectively. The obesity paradox in patients with ACS has been confirmed. Although it seems to be clear and quite obvious, outcomes should be interpreted with caution. It is remarkable that obese patients had more often diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, but they were younger and had less bleeding complications, which could have influence on their survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 166 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 38 22%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,511,322
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#583
of 1,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,842
of 267,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.