| Title |
Impact of intra-arrest therapeutic hypothermia in outcomes of prehospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3519-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Debaty, Maxime Maignan, Dominique Savary, François-xavier Koch, Stéphane Ruckly, Michel Durand, Julien Picard, Christophe Escallier, Renaud Chouquer, Charles Santre, Clemence Minet, Dorra Guergour, Laure Hammer, Hélène Bouvaist, Loic Belle, Christophe Adrie, Jean-François Payen, Françoise Carpentier, Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud, Vincent Danel, Jean-François Timsit |
| Abstract |
Mild therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is recommended as soon as possible after the return of spontaneous circulation to improve outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Preclinical data suggest that the benefit of TH could be increased if treatment is started during cardiac arrest. We aimed to study the impact of intra-arrest therapeutic hypothermia (IATH) on neurological injury and inflammation following OHCA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 24% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,680,709
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,331
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,933
of 260,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.