| Title |
Origin of the unique ventilatory apparatus of turtles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms6211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyler R. Lyson, Emma R. Schachner, Jennifer Botha-Brink, Torsten M. Scheyer, Markus Lambertz, G. S. Bever, Bruce S. Rubidge, Kevin de Queiroz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 37% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#315,843
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,771
of 59,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,097
of 277,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#33
of 766 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 766 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.