↓ Skip to main content

Attention Training in Autism as a Potential Approach to Improving Academic Performance: A School-Based Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Attention Training in Autism as a Potential Approach to Improving Academic Performance: A School-Based Pilot Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3371-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayra Muller Spaniol, Lilach Shalev, Lila Kossyvaki, Carmel Mevorach

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of an attention intervention program (Computerized Progressive Attentional Training; CPAT) in improving academic performance of children with ASD. Fifteen 6-10 year olds with ASD attending a mainstream and a special school were assigned to an experimental (CPAT; n = 8) and active control (computer games; n = 7) group. Children were assessed pre- and post-intervention on measures of behavioural symptoms, cognitive skills and academic performance. The intervention was conducted in school twice a week for 8 weeks. Children in the CPAT group showed cognitive and academic improvements over and above the active control group, while children in both groups showed improvements in behaviour. Results suggest that attention training is a feasible approach to improving academic performance in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 247 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 76 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 28%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 87 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,176,497
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,976
of 5,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,646
of 338,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#51
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.