↓ Skip to main content

Prions and chaperones: Friends or foes?

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Prions and chaperones: Friends or foes?
Published in
Biochemistry, August 2014
DOI 10.1134/s0006297914080045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Y. Y. Stroylova, G. G. Kiselev, E. V. Schmalhausen, V. I. Muronetz

Abstract

This review highlights the modern perception of anomalous folding of the prion protein and the role of chaperones therein. Special attention is paid to prion proteins from mammalian species, which are prone to amyloid-like prion diseases due to a unique aggregation pathway. Despite being a significantly popular current subject of investigations, the etiology, structure, and function of both normal and anomalous prion proteins still hold many mysteries. The most interesting of those are connected to the interaction with chaperone system, which is responsible for stabilizing protein structure and disrupting aggregates. In the case of prion proteins the following question is of the most importance - can chaperones influence different stages of the formation of pathological aggregates (these vary from intermediate oligomers to mature amyloid-like fibrils) and the whole transition from native prion protein to its amyloid-like fibril-enriched form? The existing inconsistencies and ambiguities in the observations made so far can be attributed to the fact that most of the investigations did not take into account the type and functional state of the chaperones. This review discusses in detail our previous works that have demonstrated fundamental differences between eukaryotic and prokaryotic chaperones in the action exerted on the amyloid-like transformation of the prion protein along with the dependence of the observed effects on the functional state of the chaperone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Chemistry 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,473,509
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#7,386
of 22,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,300
of 243,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#29
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.