↓ Skip to main content

Anemia in Heart Failure Still Relevant?

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
217 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anemia in Heart Failure Still Relevant?
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels Grote Beverborg, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Peter van der Meer

Abstract

One-third of all patients with heart failure have anemia, and its presence is associated with more symptoms, increased rates of hospitalization, and mortality. The etiology of anemia is multifactorial, complex, and varies between patients. The most important factors leading to anemia in heart failure are inadequate erythropoietin production resulting from renal failure, intrinsic bone marrow defects, medication use, and nutritional deficiencies such as iron deficiency. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been proven to successfully correct hemoglobin levels, albeit without significant improvement in clinical outcome. On the contrary, the use of ESAs has led to increased rates of thromboembolic events and ischemic stroke. This use of ESAs for the treatment of anemia in heart failure, therefore, cannot be recommended. In addition, these results question whether anemia is a therapeutic target or merely a marker of disease severity. Other therapies are being studied and include agents targeting the erythropoietin receptor, hepcidin pathway, or iron availability. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of anemia in heart failure, explanations why investigated therapies might not have led to the desired results, and discussions of promising future therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Master 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 75 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 77 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#325,534
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#63
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,858
of 342,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.