↓ Skip to main content

Difference in correspondence between visual field defect and inner macular layer thickness measured using three types of spectral-domain OCT instruments

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Difference in correspondence between visual field defect and inner macular layer thickness measured using three types of spectral-domain OCT instruments
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10384-014-0355-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaori Ueda, Akiyasu Kanamori, Azusa Akashi, Yuki Kawaka, Yuko Yamada, Makoto Nakamura

Abstract

To compare the relationship between visual field sensitivity (VFS) and macular parameters measured using three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) instruments and to determine a base level (=floor effect) for macular parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 67%
Psychology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#378
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,664
of 276,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.