↓ Skip to main content

Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration estimation to the Thornthwaite and Penman–Monteith methods in the study of global drylands

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration estimation to the Thornthwaite and Penman–Monteith methods in the study of global drylands
Published in
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00376-017-6313-1
Authors

Qing Yang, Zhuguo Ma, Ziyan Zheng, Yawen Duan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 27%
Engineering 5 14%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#862,364
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#90
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,926
of 331,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.