↓ Skip to main content

Molecular roles and function of circular RNAs in eukaryotic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Molecular roles and function of circular RNAs in eukaryotic cells
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00018-017-2688-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesca M. Holdt, Alexander Kohlmaier, Daniel Teupser

Abstract

Protein-coding and noncoding genes in eukaryotes are typically expressed as linear messenger RNAs, with exons arranged colinearly to their genomic order. Recent advances in sequencing and in mapping RNA reads to reference genomes have revealed that thousands of genes express also covalently closed circular RNAs. Many of these circRNAs are stable and contain exons, but are not translated into proteins. Here, we review the emerging understanding that both, circRNAs produced by co- and posttranscriptional head-to-tail "backsplicing" of a downstream splice donor to a more upstream splice acceptor, as well as circRNAs generated from intronic lariats during colinear splicing, may exhibit physiologically relevant regulatory functions in eukaryotes. We describe how circRNAs impact gene expression of their host gene locus by affecting transcriptional initiation and elongation or splicing, and how they partake in controlling the function of other molecules, for example by interacting with microRNAs and proteins. We conclude with an outlook how circRNA dysregulation affects disease, and how the stability of circRNAs might be exploited in biomedical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 24%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 57 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 64 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,881,421
of 24,462,749 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#217
of 5,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,935
of 336,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,462,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.