↓ Skip to main content

High-Entropy Alloys: A Current Evaluation of Founding Ideas and Core Effects and Exploring “Nonlinear Alloys”

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
Title
High-Entropy Alloys: A Current Evaluation of Founding Ideas and Core Effects and Exploring “Nonlinear Alloys”
Published in
JOM, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11837-017-2527-z
Authors

Daniel B. Miracle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 22%
Student > Master 33 12%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 84 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 110 39%
Engineering 33 12%
Unspecified 9 3%
Physics and Astronomy 5 2%
Chemical Engineering 4 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 111 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,756,367
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,313
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,546
of 318,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.