↓ Skip to main content

HDAC inhibitors: modulating leukocyte differentiation, survival, proliferation and inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Immunology & Cell Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HDAC inhibitors: modulating leukocyte differentiation, survival, proliferation and inflammation
Published in
Immunology & Cell Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/icb.2011.88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Sweet, Melanie R Shakespear, Nabilah A Kamal, David P Fairlie

Abstract

Therapeutic effects of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors in cancer models were first linked to their ability to cause growth arrest and apoptosis of tumor cells. It is now clear that these agents also have pleiotropic effects on angiogenesis and the immune system, and some of these properties are likely to contribute to their anti-cancer activities. It is also emerging that inhibitors of specific HDACs affect the differentiation, survival and/or proliferation of distinct immune cell populations. This is true for innate immune cells such as macrophages, as well as cells of the acquired immune system, for example, T-regulatory cells. These effects may contribute to therapeutic profiles in some autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disease models. Here, we review our current understanding of how classical HDACs (HDACs 1-11) and their inhibitors impact on differentiation, survival and proliferation of distinct leukocyte populations, as well as the likely relevance of these effects to autoimmune and inflammatory disease processes. The ability of HDAC inhibitors to modulate leukocyte survival may have implications for the rationale of developing selective inhibitors as anti-inflammatory drugs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 31%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Immunology & Cell Biology
#1,595
of 1,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,832
of 152,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunology & Cell Biology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.