↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of Vitamin and Mineral Deficiencies After Bariatric Surgery: Evidence and Algorithms

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Prevention of Vitamin and Mineral Deficiencies After Bariatric Surgery: Evidence and Algorithms
Published in
Obesity Surgery, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11695-008-9489-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dave H. Schweitzer, Eduardus F. Posthuma

Abstract

Bariatric surgery is widely accepted as first-choice treatment of morbid obesity and has also shown promising results in the treatment of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. The number of operations each year is increasing, as well as, consequently, the urgent need for a coordinated nutritional approach, as micronutrient deficiencies occur frequently in these patients. Official guidelines on chronic use of multivitamins and minerals are, yet, unavailable in bariatric medicine. The current review provides an algorithm that supports bariatric teams to guarantee adequate nutrition after the operation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,382,900
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,536
of 3,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,836
of 81,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.