| Title |
Relative influences of multiple sources of uncertainty on cumulative and incremental tree-ring-derived aboveground biomass estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trees, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00468-017-1629-0 |
| Authors |
M. Ross Alexander, Christine R. Rollinson, Flurin Babst, Valerie Trouet, David J. P. Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 44% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,442,318
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#26
of 593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,113
of 343,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.