↓ Skip to main content

Persistence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA Following Treatment for Pharyngeal and Rectal Gonorrhea Is Influenced by Antibiotic Susceptibility and Reinfection

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Persistence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA Following Treatment for Pharyngeal and Rectal Gonorrhea Is Influenced by Antibiotic Susceptibility and Reinfection
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, November 2014
DOI 10.1093/cid/ciu873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie Bissessor, David M. Whiley, Christopher K. Fairley, Catriona S. Bradshaw, David M. Lee, Anthony S. Snow, Monica M. Lahra, Jane S. Hocking, Marcus Y. Chen

Abstract

 To guide interpretation of gonorrhea tests of cure using nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), this study examined the persistence of N. gonorrhoeae DNA following treatment for pharyngeal and rectal gonorrhea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Engineering 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,055,825
of 24,846,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#12,013
of 16,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,947
of 268,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#120
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,846,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.