↓ Skip to main content

Radioprotective agents to prevent cellular damage due to ionizing radiation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Radioprotective agents to prevent cellular damage due to ionizing radiation
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12967-017-1338-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler A. Smith, Daniel R. Kirkpatrick, Sean Smith, Trevor K. Smith, Tate Pearson, Aparna Kailasam, Kortney Z. Herrmann, Johanna Schubert, Devendra K. Agrawal

Abstract

Medical imaging has become a central component of patient care to ensure early and accurate diagnosis. Unfortunately, many imaging modalities use ionizing radiation to generate images. Ionizing radiation even in low doses can cause direct DNA damage and generate reactive oxygen species and free radicals, leading to DNA, protein, and lipid membrane damage. This cell damage can lead to apoptosis, necrosis, teratogenesis, or carcinogenesis. As many as 2% of cancers (and an associated 15,000 deaths annually) can be linked to computed tomography exposure alone. Radioprotective agents have been investigated using various models including cells, animals, and recently humans. The data suggest that radioprotective agents working through a variety of mechanisms have the potential to decrease free radical damage produced by ionizing radiation. Radioprotective agents may be useful as an adjunct to medical imaging to reduced patient morbidity and mortality due to ionizing radiation exposure. Some radioprotective agents can be found in high quantities in antioxidant rich foods, suggesting that a specific diet recommendation could be beneficial in radioprotection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 190 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 67 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Chemistry 10 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 71 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,129,102
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#878
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,414
of 337,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.