↓ Skip to main content

Body fat distribution and associations with metabolic and clinical characteristics in bipolar individuals

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Body fat distribution and associations with metabolic and clinical characteristics in bipolar individuals
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00406-014-0559-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina Lackner, Harald Mangge, Eva Z. Reininghaus, Roger S. McIntyre, Susanne A. Bengesser, Armin Birner, Bernd Reininghaus, Hans-Peter Kapfhammer, Sandra J. Wallner-Liebmann

Abstract

Overweight and obesity differentially affect bipolar disorder (BD) and are associated with a poorer prognosis. Herein, we sought to evaluate body fat distribution in a well-characterized BD sample. Anthropometric measures (i.e., body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, hip circumference, and lipometry) of 100 BD individuals were compared with data of 57 matched mentally healthy controls. Additionally, fasting serum parameters including metabolic parameters and monoamines were analyzed. Findings indicate that similar to US BD cohorts, Austrian patients exhibit an increased central body fat accumulation (i.e., higher subcutaneous adipose tissue at upper abdomen) accompanying with the harmful IDF-defined metabolic syndrome. In addition, positive associations between epinephrine as well as staging and fat parameters were detected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#987
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,203
of 264,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.