↓ Skip to main content

Academic and Social Integration on Campus Among Sexual Minority Students: The Impacts of Psychological and Experiential Campus Climate

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Academic and Social Integration on Campus Among Sexual Minority Students: The Impacts of Psychological and Experiential Campus Climate
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10464-014-9683-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R. Woodford, Alex Kulick

Abstract

A heterosexist campus climate can increase risk for mental health problems for sexual minority students; however, the relationship between campus climate for sexual minorities and academic outcomes remains understudied. Using a sample of sexual minority respondents extracted from a campus climate survey conducted at a large university in the Midwest, we examine relationships between multiple dimensions of psychological and experiential campus climate for sexual minorities with academic integration (academic disengagement, grade-point average [GPA]) and social integration (institutional satisfaction, acceptance on campus). We also investigate the protective role of engagement with informal academic and peer-group systems. Findings suggest campus climate affects sexual minority students' integration. In multivariate analyses, perceptions of whether lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people could be open about their sexual identity was positively associated with acceptance on campus; personal heterosexist harassment was positively associated with academic disengagement and negatively with GPA. Students' informal academic integration (instructor relations) and informal social integration (LGB friends) demonstrated influential main effects but did not moderate any of the climate-outcome relationships. Researchers should further explore the relationships between climate and academic outcomes among sexual minority students, both collectively and among specific sub-groups, and address the role of other protective factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Researcher 13 6%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 54 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 62 27%
Psychology 51 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Arts and Humanities 9 4%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 60 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#19,514,243
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#1,002
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,114
of 268,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.