↓ Skip to main content

Southern Ocean pteropods at risk from ocean warming and acidification

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Southern Ocean pteropods at risk from ocean warming and acidification
Published in
Marine Biology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00227-017-3261-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessie Gardner, Clara Manno, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Victoria L. Peck, Geraint A. Tarling

Abstract

Early life stages of marine calcifiers are particularly vulnerable to climate change. In the Southern Ocean aragonite undersaturation events and areas of rapid warming already occur and are predicted to increase in extent. Here, we present the first study to successfully hatch the polar pteropod Limacina helicina antarctica and observe the potential impact of exposure to increased temperature and aragonite undersaturation resulting from ocean acidification (OA) on the early life stage survival and shell morphology. High larval mortality (up to 39%) was observed in individuals exposed to perturbed conditions. Warming and OA induced extensive shell malformation and dissolution, respectively, increasing shell fragility. Furthermore, shell growth decreased, with variation between treatments and exposure time. Our results demonstrate that short-term exposure through passing through hotspots of OA and warming poses a serious threat to pteropod recruitment and long-term population viability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Researcher 14 13%
Other 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 23%
Environmental Science 21 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,790,112
of 23,751,351 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#208
of 3,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,119
of 329,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,751,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.