↓ Skip to main content

Learning to play: A review and theoretical investigation of the developmental mechanisms and functions of cetacean play

Overview of attention for article published in Learning & Behavior, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Learning to play: A review and theoretical investigation of the developmental mechanisms and functions of cetacean play
Published in
Learning & Behavior, August 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13420-017-0291-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather M. Hill, Sarah Dietrich, Briana Cappiello

Abstract

Play is a behavioral phenomenon most commonly observed in the young of both solitary and social species. Documentation of play in cetaceans varies across species and settings. Cetacean play behavioral repertoires include a broad range of actions, such as the manipulation of diverse objects, blowing bubbles, chasing conspecifics, and swimming in spirals through the water. As is common in research on animal play, cetacean play has been grouped into categories by its form, including locomotor play, object play, and different variations of social play, such as affiliative games, play fighting, and socio-sexual play. Research has primarily focused on recording the topography of cetacean play and the demographics of the individuals engaging in play. However, these classifications are insufficient to address the possible developmental and societal functions of cetacean play behaviors, or the mechanisms with which play behaviors are spread between conspecifics and acquired by young members of cetacean populations. This article applies several developmental and social learning theories in order to organize current knowledge and guide future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 25%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 26%
Psychology 12 16%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,235,562
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Learning & Behavior
#147
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,963
of 327,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning & Behavior
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.