↓ Skip to main content

KRAS Mutation in Gastric Cancer and Prognostication Associated with Microsatellite Instability Status

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 753)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
KRAS Mutation in Gastric Cancer and Prognostication Associated with Microsatellite Instability Status
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12253-017-0348-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karol Polom, Kakoli Das, Daniele Marrelli, Giandomenico Roviello, Valeria Pascale, Costantino Voglino, Henry Rho, Patrick Tan, Franco Roviello

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the subgroups based on the new molecular classification of gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we analyzed the role of KRAS status in MSI GC and the impact of MSI status on KRAS mutation. We performed analysis on 595 GC patients. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for the screening of KRAS mutation (exon 2) and 5 quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeats, namely, BAT-26, BAT-25, NR -24, NR-21, and NR-27 were used to determine the MSI status. The KRAS and MSI status were then compared with clinicopathologic data of the GC patients. MSI GC was found in 20.3% of all cases. KRAS mutation was seen in 24 patients; 18 were MSI (75%) and 6 were microsatellite stable (MSS) (25%). MSI GC patients with KRAS mutation were older and mostly female, but MSS presented more advanced T and N stage of the disease, more cardia tumors, and adjuvant treatment. Five-year survival was 72.2% for KRAS mutation patients with MSI and 0% for MSS (p < 0.001). Although KRAS mutations in GC are linked with MSI in the majority of cases, KRAS mutations with MSS status presented with a poor prognosis and a worse outcome. In multivariate analysis, MSI was associated with better survival (p < 0.001) but KRAS was with worse survival (p = 0.304). Our study suggests that KRAS mutations are based on MSI status rather than different codon subtypes of mutation, and such a division could be used to determine the GC patient outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Chemistry 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 15 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,969,186
of 24,169,085 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#39
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,711
of 335,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,169,085 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.