↓ Skip to main content

Intestinal Permeability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Intestinal Permeability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13311-017-0582-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

M.C. Buscarinu, S. Romano, R. Mechelli, R. Pizzolato Umeton, M. Ferraldeschi, A. Fornasiero, R. Reniè, B. Cerasoli, E. Morena, C. Romano, N.D. Loizzo, R. Umeton, M. Salvetti, G. Ristori

Abstract

Changes of intestinal permeability (IP) have been extensively investigated in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and celiac disease (CD), underpinned by a known unbalance between microbiota, IP and immune responses in the gut. Recently the influence of IP on brain function has greatly been appreciated. Previous works showed an increased IP that preceded experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis development and worsened during disease with disruption of TJ. Moreover, studying co-morbidity between Crohn's disease and MS, a report described increased IP in a minority of cases with MS. In a recent work we found that an alteration of IP is a relatively frequent event in relapsing-remitting MS, with a possible genetic influence on the determinants of IP changes (as inferable from data on twins); IP changes included a deficit of the active mechanism of absorption from intestinal lumen. The results led us to hypothesize that gut may contribute to the development of MS, as suggested by another previous work of our group: a population of CD8+CD161high T cells, belonging to the mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, a gut- and liver-homing subset, proved to be of relevance for MS pathogenesis. We eventually suggest future lines of research on IP in MS: studies on IP changes in patients under first-line oral drugs may result useful to improve their therapeutic index; correlating IP and microbiota changes, or IP and blood-brain barrier changes may help clarify disease pathogenesis; exploiting the IP data to disclose co-morbidities in MS, especially with CD and IBD, may be important for patient care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Neuroscience 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,317,063
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#460
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,017
of 449,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.