↓ Skip to main content

The influence of age and mild cognitive impairment on associative memory performance and underlying brain networks

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The influence of age and mild cognitive impairment on associative memory performance and underlying brain networks
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11682-014-9335-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane S. H. Oedekoven, Andreas Jansen, James L. Keidel, Tilo Kircher, Dirk Leube

Abstract

Associative memory is essential to everyday activities, such as the binding of faces and corresponding names to form single bits of information. However, this ability often becomes impaired with increasing age. The most important neural substrate of associative memory is the hippocampus, a structure crucially implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The main aim of this study was to compare neural correlates of associative memory in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an at-risk state for AD. We used fMRI to investigate differences in brain activation and connectivity between young controls (n = 20), elderly controls (n = 32) and MCI patients (n = 21) during associative memory retrieval. We observed lower hippocampal activation in MCI patients than control groups during a face-name recognition task, and the magnitude of this decrement was correlated with lower associative memory performance. Further, increased activation in precentral regions in all older adults indicated a stronger involvement of the task positive network (TPN) with age. Finally, functional connectivity analysis revealed a stronger link of hippocampal and striatal components in older adults in comparison to young controls, regardless of memory impairment. In elderly controls, this went hand-in-hand with a stronger activation of striatal areas. Increased TPN activation may be linked to greater reliance on cognitive control in both older groups, while increased functional connectivity between the hippocampus and the striatum may suggest dedifferentiation, especially in elderly controls.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 35%
Neuroscience 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,310,081
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#671
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,124
of 262,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.