You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ambiguous role of CCR5 in Y. pestis infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature02822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen J. Elvin, E. Diane Williamson, Joanne C. Scott, Jeremy N. Smith, Guillermo Pérez de Lema, Silvia Chilla, Paul Clapham, Klaus Pfeffer, Detlef Schlöndorff, Bruno Luckow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Professor | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 86 | 85% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 86 | 85% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,316,114
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#51,829
of 98,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,489
of 60,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#126
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.