↓ Skip to main content

International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, February 2008
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400358
Authors

Alexander Oettl, Ajay Agrawal

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 189 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 35%
Student > Master 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Professor 14 7%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 96 48%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 16%
Social Sciences 20 10%
Engineering 4 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#335
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,680
of 156,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them