↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Care for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Malignant Glioma

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
325 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Care for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Malignant Glioma
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, February 2005
DOI 10.1001/jama.293.5.557
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan M. Chang, Ian F. Parney, Wei Huang, Frederick A. Anderson, Anthony L. Asher, Mark Bernstein, Kevin O. Lillehei, Henry Brem, Mitchel S. Berger, Edward R. Laws, for the Glioma Outcomes Project Investigators

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 244 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Neuroscience 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#32,277
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,456
of 158,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#95
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.