↓ Skip to main content

Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 363)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
Title
Development as institutional change: The pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/bf02686327
Authors

Peter Evans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 357 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 31%
Student > Master 62 16%
Researcher 43 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 46 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 209 54%
Environmental Science 41 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 35 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 4%
Arts and Humanities 9 2%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 56 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,117,458
of 25,844,815 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#19
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,086
of 153,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them